Since today’s race can be said to have been particularly uneventful, there were no opportunities to see whether any procedures were changed as a result of some hasty decision meant to further reduce risks that are already shockingly low. However, over this past week I did see various articles mentioning that both closed cockpits and taking decisions completely away from any humans, whether by automatically and immediately deploying the safety car or by enforcing a speed limit every single time an accident results in a car being left stranded on or off the side of the track, were being discussed. Obviously, none of these will apply by the end of this season, but at this point it seems surprisingly likely that one of these options, possibly the last one, will be adopted as of next year.
Of course, there were proposals that made much more sense as well, and I’m referring to those regarding the recovery vehicles. Changing the way in which those are deployed and used in order to minimize the risk of another car striking one and making changes to them in order to prevent such a car from ending up underneath if such an event does occur again would increase safety without affecting racing, and also while still allowing the drivers to decide the risks they’re willing to take.
The fact is that over 20 years passed since the last Formula 1 accident that had such serious consequences, and that’s an absolutely unbelievable safety record for motor sports. In fact, no fatalities for such a long time would be impressive for just about any sport that has any sort of risk involved, and motor sports inherently carry a degree of risk which can’t be completely eliminated. As such, it can’t be said that there’s something wrong with Formula 1’s safety regulations as a whole or with the way the previous race was handled in general, and Bianchi’s crash can, and most likely should, be seen as a particularly unfortunate accident that had to happen sooner or later.
That said, whether that recovery vehicle had any business being there at that time, considering the conditions and the position of Sutil’s car, is definitely still a matter for debate and I do maintain my opinion that it shouldn’t have been deployed under those circumstances. If the actions taken by the race officials were in line with the current regulations, said regulations, and possibly also the design of the recovery vehicles themselves, may require some adjustments, while if anything was done against the current regulations then whoever made that decision may share a part of the blame for what happened. However, discussing any other additional safety measures at this moment seems pointless at best, and likely detrimental to the sport if any will actually end up being implemented.
Motor sports inherently carry a degree of risk and all those who participate accept this fact. Actually, even the spectators have to accept it, as it was pointed out that such a notification is printed on the back of every ticket. Now of course this risk should be reduced as much as possible, but not in ways which will have a significant negative impact on the racing or take away any amount of freedom the drivers still have to decide how far they’re willing to push the limits.
Moving on, let me say a few words about the specific measures proposed that do not deal with the recovery vehicles, starting with the closed cockpits. This does seem least likely to happen, and for good reason, because I doubt there are many scenarios in which the drivers would be protected by such a solution significantly better than they are by the current design and their helmets. In fact, I can think of cases where a closed cockpit would make matters worse, such as when a malfunction would prevent a driver from quickly escaping a burning vehicle or when help would reach an injured driver later than it would in an open cockpit. In addition, a closed cockpit may mean some shards in case of major impacts, which would actually increase the risk of injury for both driver and stewards or medical workers, and hot and sunny races would likely be even more uncomfortable than they are now even if everything functions as it should and there are no accidents to make matters worse.
Deploying the safety car for all accidents, on the other hand, may in a way make for more interesting racing, but there are problems with this as well. For one, there have also been accidents under the safety car and the fact that none have been so serious doesn’t mean anything when there haven’t been any this serious for over 20 years under any circumstances. After all, I doubt you’d be feeling that much better if you’d be slamming your head into the back of a truck at 120 km/h instead of 250 km/h. On top of that, if the safety car is on track too long, there may be too little time left to race, especially when you consider the fact that overtaking tends to be more difficult on the tracks that are more likely to see accidents. Last but not least, there is the matter of the lapped cars, which are currently allowed to overtake once the track is clear, with the safety car leaving the track once they return to the back of the pack. This already is a problem and will become an even greater one if races will be neutralized more often, but at the same time eliminating this rule would be completely unfair to those lapped drivers, as one may be only a few seconds behind another when the safety car is deployed and end up a full lap behind when they can get back to racing, simply because the race leader had already lapped one and not the other.
As for enforcing speed limits, either way that’s done it’d simply ask for trouble. If it’d be done automatically, such as by a command that makes the car activate the pit lane limiter in the area where yellow flags are being waved, the heavy braking and sudden acceleration may create more problems than the measure would prevent, plus that it’d simply take away the drivers’ right to decide how much they’re willing to push in an area where the risks are perhaps slightly higher than normal. If, on the other hand, it’d be done by requiring the driver to lose a certain amount of time compared to their normal pace, as is now the case for those who are still in clear air when the safety car’s on track, it’d likely be like opening a can of worms. I mean, will there be specific timers covering every possible area in order to apply this only to the part of the track affected by yellow flags or will this requirement apply to an entire sector or even lap? In the former scenario, how would the driver be certain they match the time, especially when it may be a matter of fractions of a second over one or two turns? In the latter, what’d stop drivers from actually gaining useful time in the affected area and slowing down in other portions, perhaps where they can defend better from those behind them?
The point is that Formula 1 is already extraordinarily safe, incredibly safe. For its first three decades, it averaged one or two driver fatalities per year, which is hardly surprising when you aim for the highest performance in motor sports, yet now more than 20 years passed not only since the last death, since Bianchi’s still alive after all, but since the last accident that resulted in injuries that left the driver at least permanently disabled, at least to the best of my knowledge. That becomes even more remarkable if you compare that record to all the injuries and deaths seen nearly every day on any country’s roads, where drivers don’t try to squeeze every last thousandth of a second out of their cars.
Of course, this doesn’t mean safety shouldn’t be improved even further even in Formula 1, but we shouldn’t simply get used to the fact that nothing happens and then react in utter shock and panic when something finally does, possibly implementing measures that’ll harm the sport in other ways as a result. It’s motor sport; accidents have happened, do happen and will happen again, no matter what measures are taken. If something can be done with the recovery vehicles, with the protocols to follow in such situations, possibly with the tracks themselves if this won’t make racing worse, it should probably be done. However, those cars are already so incredibly safe, their raw performance has been hampered in so many ways for the past decade and more, and the racing has, until very recently, suffered so badly for so long, that it’d likely be better to focus on other matters for the foreseeable future, and meanwhile strive to apply the safety lessons learned in racing on road cars, where further developments are definitely still needed.