[ View menu ]

The United Nations’ Security Council’s Resolution on Libya: Only too Late or Also too Little?

After long and, at best, utterly pointless discussions, the United Nations’ Security Council finally voted to approve establishing a no-fly zone in Libya and also to take “all necessary measures short of an occupation force” to protect civilians and civilian-populated areas from Gaddafi’s attacks. France, the United Kingdom, the United States, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia, Gabon, Lebanon, Nigeria, Portugal and South Africa voted in favor and there were no votes against the resolution, but China, Russia, Brazil, Germany and India abstained.
Of course, I’m not at all surprised by China not agreeing with this, in fact perhaps being a little surprised that they only abstained, while Russia’s position was exactly the one everyone expected them to have, but the other three countries that abstained leave a very bitter taste in my mouth. Brazil actually was a slight surprise, because I hadn’t seen anything these days stating that they were against such a resolution, though it may just be that I missed those reports. India and, even more so, Germany were known to oppose any sort of military action, though it’s no less unpleasant that nobody managed to change their stance.

I’m actually pleased by the rather permissive wording of the resolution, which allows for all sorts of attacks against Gaddafi’s forces if they so much as approach a city, seeing as that’d certainly count as a “civilian-populated area”, and probably even allows for assassination attempts, as a small team of assassins certainly couldn’t be considered “an occupation force” and therefore could potentially be deployed. Now it all depends on what exactly will each country do and when, because the rebels may well have only hours left otherwise. After all, Gaddafi’s son stated Wednesday that “it will all be over within 48 hours” and some hours ago Gaddafi himself said that the full assault on Benghazi will begin tonight and there will be no mercy shown to anyone who is armed or has fought against his troops.
A lot of things should be happening before dawn, though I’m currently seeing that US and NATO “sources” are disputing claims that warplanes will be in Libyan skies tonight. Still, the US did hint towards airstrikes aimed at tank columns and military vessels heading towards Benghazi and was reportedly already moving its own vessels in the area, France stated that aircraft will be ready to launch “within hours” of the resolution being passed and Canada already pledged six fighter jets to the efforts. Also, since the United Kingdom and Lebanon, alongside France, co-sponsored the resolution, one would assume that those countries would be swift to act as well. Especially the United Kingdom, as the British authorities still have a lot to atone for regarding their slow response when it came to evacuating British citizens caught in Libya at the start of the crisis.

But now I’ll have a slightly different question: If it’s wrong to start a war without the UN’s approval, wouldn’t it be equally wrong to openly refuse to take part in one that actually is started by the UN? I’m talking about Germany’s stance of course, saying that they will not take part in any sort of military action regardless of the UN’s resolution and instead advocating “measures” that’d be laughable if there wouldn’t be so many lives and likely even a part of the world’s future at stake, such as “targeted sanctions, political pressure and international isolation”. I mean, those are the things that the world has tried so far, since the start of the Libyan conflict, and the current situation should be proof enough that they’re not only not going to work, but in fact attempting such things only buys Gaddafi and his forces time to get back in control, making removing him even less likely in the future!
Thing is that I somehow doubt that anyone wants him back in control now. Well, all right, other dictatorships, including China, most likely wouldn’t mind, but otherwise… I’m not sure if Russia cares one way or the other right at this moment, while other countries that are too far from the conflict to possibly be directly affected immediately and that have rulers blind enough to fail to see the implications may think that it’s not their problem, but think that even they are somewhat bothered by the prospect, just not enough to actually want to get involved right now. But there is a very real danger that Gaddafi himself, who was, with great difficulty, ostensibly turned away from terrorism and converted into an ally against al-Qaeda, will get back to his old ways if allowed to win this war, especially considering all the recent violent outbursts aimed at the United States, France and various other countries that openly opposed his attacks.
There was this pretty blunt statement from his defense ministry earlier: “Any foreign military act against Libya will expose all air and maritime traffic in the Mediterranean Sea to danger, and civilian and military [facilities] will become targets of Libya’s counterattack. The Mediterranean basin will face danger not just in the short-term, but also in the long-term.” I believe that a significant number of countries will not take kindly to that, but also that they will not take kindly to any other countries that will refuse to help them defend themselves from this threat, especially when said countries are generally considered to be allies…

Still, let’s wait and see how this will play out. Considering the number of casualties and the destruction caused by this conflict so far, it’s undeniable that the UN’s resolution came too late for far too many. But, mainly thanks to the sacrifice of the rebels who desperately, and improbably, managed to hold on to at least a part of Ajdabiya in face of Gaddafi’s continued onslaught in order to ensure that the vote will come before the start of the full and final assault on Benghazi, it may still be just in time to win this war… Assuming it’s not too little as well… And Libyans do seem to think it’s not too little, as current reports state that celebrations and demonstrations have started in various Libyan cities, including the capital Tripoli. Of course, such reports can’t be verified, but we’ll see what kind of information will trickle in over the next few hours.

Written by Cavalary on March 18, 2011 at 3:53 AM in Society | 0 Comments

Another Stalker? Plus the Required Forsaken World Update

This would be more of the same, a Sunday post thrown in just to have two written this week, but it would appear that I have something to say today, due to a strange visitor I had here last night. Not that I wouldn’t have plenty of things to say otherwise as well, but not something suitable for such a rushed post on the last evening of the week. In fact, don’t have something suitable for rushed posts at any time, though I somehow managed to do a relatively decent job with the last one, as well as with last week’s serious post

Anyway, the point is that there is a person who stumbled upon my OkCupid profile some days ago, poked around the blog a little as well and then sent me a message there asking if I have anxiety problems. I ignored the message, but he was back last night, first visiting my profile and then back on the blog. (By the way, I’m saying “he” because he lists himself as male on OkCupid, but the profile is otherwise empty and the required information is fake, such as showing up as being 101 years old, so that’s just for convenience’s sake.) First he had what appeared to be a couple of unsuccessful attempts of searching for posts in Romanian, then did searches for “dad” and “money” and went rather thoroughly through the results. Which could indicate that he’s not actually looking for me, but knows who my dad is and is gathering information, particularly financial information, about him? Or was he just checking to see if he could figure out how much I could possibly pay for something, the search for “dad” being a result of seeing that I have no income of my own?
Interestingly, there was a guy who started chatting with me on OkCupid some months ago and the nick does ring a bell, but I really couldn’t tell you whether it’s the same one or just a similar one or my memory is really playing tricks on me. That guy also asked about my anxiety problems and seemed to prepare, in a somewhat roundabout way, to start telling me about some miraculous solution for such issues when I cut in and directly asked what exactly was he trying to sell me. He said he wasn’t exactly selling anything, but wanted to let me know of a potential solution that he used himself, at which point I said I’m not interested and ended the conversation as politely as I could while mentally sending him to various highly uncomfortable places and locations. So of course I’m wondering if this is not the same person, only apparently much more determined this time around.

The above paragraph isn’t why I say “another” in the title though. That’s because of some other person who stalked me on-line for weeks, if not months, back in 2007. Also coming from OkCupid, but either browsing secretly or not even having an account, because I never saw profile views related to the loads of quite thorough visits to my blog that came from there, all by the same person. That ended after said stalker apparently got bold and posted this comment (the one under the name Gabi, to make it clear) and I gave the reply that, due to some weird issue, shows up above it on that page. Probably didn’t like it anymore after seeing that I was in on it.
As a general note, I have few visitors on this site. I didn’t have many at the old location either, but they were still usually three to five times more than I usually have now, since many people apparently won’t update links even after six months… Either way, the vast majority of visits are strictly for the Perfect World International Information Dump page, so anyone taking any sort of interest in the rest of the site stands out right away, and anyone taking that sort of interest repeatedly even more so. Which means it’d be awfully hard for me to miss any such, shall we say, events, don’t you think?

So… Ahem… Dear stalker: If you’re trying to sell or otherwise promote some sort of “cure” for anxiety, I’m not interested, so move along and don’t come back. If, on the other hand, you want to know something about my dad, kindly go ask him. If neither of these is true, then would you kindly explain yourself? Because your course of action is rather peculiar and suspicious to say the least… Especially if you’re the same person that contacted me last time as well.

But enough about that. Can’t end a personal post these days without saying something about Forsaken World, right? So I will say that the open beta did launch pretty much right on schedule and that the European English server is thankfully PvE, so I can use it for my characters. Lots of people are extremely angered by that decision and they can make quite a mess on the forums, seeing as those who want PvP servers are the extremely competitive, violent and/or simply frustrated ones, so just the ones who can generally complain very much and very loudly. In fact, the server’s not even listed as PvE when you’re asked to select servers, indicating that they could eventually go forward with a controversial leaked plan stating that, on the European servers, some realms would be PvE and others PvP, but so far it seems to just be PvE and I’m happy with that.
As for my characters, I recreated my human mage and my vampire. I really liked playing my marksman, the skills seemed to work really well with my playing style, but mage remains my top choice in any game and vampire had to be the second because being able to play a vampire was what made me interested in this game in the first place, so the marksman got left behind because I didn’t want to struggle with three characters again, considering that plenty of the items you obtain early in the game expire after a certain number of days. So it’s these two and so far it’s going surprisingly well. I got both to level 21 basically without getting out of Freedom Harbor and have just started the main quest chain now. Sold the obsidian shards you get for free for pocket change, so I’m trying to do this second part of the main quest without proper gear, being far higher level than I should be while doing it. Then I’m even considering skipping straight to the kind of gear you get for sapphire shards, so going over the ruby ones as well, because now I know I can get to level 30 without significant problems, though it certainly will be difficult to do the final part of the Sea of Oblivion quests with such awful equipment…

Written by Cavalary on March 13, 2011 at 7:43 PM in Personal | 2 Comments

What’s Wrong with Genetically Modified Organisms, You Ask?

A couple of days ago, the Greens’ Movement from here posted a link to an article about the Romanian government desiring to allow a large number of genetically modified crops to be grown in the country. Basically, they seem willing to allow everything that’s not for some reason banned by the European Union, supposedly in an attempt to make Romania’s agricultural sector once again competitive on the common market. Which, of course, didn’t surprise me, but did remind me that I should write something about this issue. Just know that I’ll sort of rush this post, so don’t expect links or too many details…

Let’s start with that economic perspective that is usually the main point anyone trying to support GMOs makes. They say that, since GMOs either directly resist pests and diseases, withstand the use of products that kill said pests, or both, the yields are much higher and therefore so are the farmers’ profits. Which seems quite true at first, until you sit and think about it for a moment.
For one, those yields tend to drop off after a while. Such intensive farming depletes the soil really fast, making it unsuitable for constant large yields, not to mention that those diseases and pests tend to evolve as well and possibly end up beating the GMOs’ resistance after some years. But that’s not the main problem. The main problem is that a farmer using commercial GMOs is basically handing over control of their life to certain companies, and particularly to Monsanto. That means they’ll have to stick to the contract signed with said company, that they’re liable for lawsuits that they can do little to nothing about if for some reason said company feels like making an example out of someone, and, most importantly, that they’ll need to buy seeds from that company every single year. And, incidentally, that company will remain in a position to set the price for those seeds, as well as all the other products farmers need, as it sees fit, but high crop yields for GMOs imply a large supply of a product that many people try to avoid anyway, which results in lower income per unit for the farmer who still has to pay just as much per unit to use the company’s products. Therefore, while the total production may look like an increase in competitiveness overall and could likely also benefit the very large farms, the situation is certainly not lucrative for the average farmer, not to mention the average farm worker.

And we reached the issue of people. Another point those who support GMOs tend to make is that many people are starving even now and the population is set to increase further, so GMOs are the only way to ensure the yields required to feed everybody. Which is where I have to agree with them, as I don’t believe there could possibly be any healthy and environmentally-friendly methods of supplying even half of the current population with what they’d need to live decent lives. But that only means that the problem is the population, which is the main roadblock on the path to solving pretty much any major problem the world is currently facing anyway. As a result, anything meant to support a growing population instead of gradually reducing it in a rational and ethical manner is in fact extremely harmful, which means that this argument blows up right in the faces of those who support it.
Then again, considering the potential negative effects GMOs may have on people’s health, using them may actually be a method of reducing population, but in a very unethical manner. Whether that is in fact anyone’s intent or not is besides the point, what matters is that it may happen. And don’t bother pointing out the fact that every single one of them is only allowed to be used after passing supposedly rigurous tests, because the trustworthiness any laboratory or researcher who deems such products safe for human consumption has in my eyes is slim to none, seeing as they usually are paid, directly or indirectly, legally or illegally, just by these companies that have every interest to have all of their products on the market as soon as possible. Besides, it would be utterly impossible to properly approve such a product for human consumption right now because, when it comes to food, such tests can only be truly valid if done on a representative sample of the human population and covering decades of regular consumption. Which, incidentally, means that they are being done right now, but that the test subjects didn’t sign up for them…

And then you have the environmental impact, which should be the most important issue to consider and which is being completely ignored by GMO advocates because there’s nothing they can say on this topic that would put them in a good light. Quite simply, plants have evolved the way they have over millions of years for certain reasons, but that all changes, with potentially devastating consequences, as soon as GMOs end up pollinating them or spreading among them, which is unavoidable if any GMOs are allowed to be cultivated in the open. And don’t say that farmers have been genetically modifying crops ever since the advent of agriculture, because all those who carefully select the best seeds and mix the best types usually do is give evolution a helping hand, improving and strengthening the plants in question without altering their makeup in any potentially dangerous way, as the current methods of genetic modification do.
From this point of view, GMOs should only be cultivated and stored in perfectly sealed places and every person who enters such an area should be scanned very thoroughly before exiting to ensure that not even one seed or one grain of pollen is left on them when they go back out. Anything but that makes no sense whatsoever from an environmental perspective. And, incidentally, doing it like that could ensure a proper testing environment, which is required if any such crops are to ever be properly verified and, after the decades mentioned above, if by some odd chance one or two of them would actually happen to truly be fit to be released into the world, eventually approved.

In all, I can only hope that the approval of any GMOs will be delayed for the decades necessary for proper testing and that by then enough of us will have woken up for this perceived need of them to no longer exist, those who would still support them being immediately seen for what they really are. And what they are is either extremely selfish people fueled only by greed who would directly benefit from these approvals and don’t care about any other potential effects in the least or poor dumb people brainwashed by the ones I just mentioned into believing their fallacious arguments.

Written by Cavalary on March 9, 2011 at 6:19 PM in Society | 0 Comments

Failed Plans and Gaming Annoyances

So much for my plan to also write a post about WikiLeaks this week. It’s been too long since the last and I’d obviously need to write a very different kind of post, but also go through a lot of information to pick the most relevant few things and build it around them, and that’s work that doesn’t seem like it’s going to get done by itself. The longer I wait, the less likely it is that I’ll ever get back to writing about that, but truth be told it’s already starting to be unlikely. So I’ll delay it once again. Perhaps it will happen next week, but I’m not going to plan for it again because I know I probably won’t do it anyway.
At least I did manage to write the planned gaming post. Incidentally, it was probably the fastest serious non-personal post I ever wrote, only taking me about one hour instead of the usual two or three. Because of that, I was thinking to make today’s post about gaming as well. More specifically, I was thinking to write a second post on solitary character classes in MMORPGs, detailing my proposed system more since the issue is currently once again at the forefront of my mind. But I realized that I’d have quite a lot of work to do if I’m to go into the details of something like that, not to mention that I’d first need a clear starting point and don’t quite have one at this very moment, so it was unlikely to be something I could do even marginally well while rushing to finish on the last evening of the week.

As a result, you get this post, which is basically just another typical one thrown here on Sunday just because I want to keep posting two things every week. But, while I’m at it, let me also tell you that I did install Perfect World International again as well once Genesis was launched and, nearly two and a half years after I stopped playing, I still find the early parts of it to be quite entertaining and engaging. Unfortunately, I also still notice some of the issues I kept pestering the developers during the original open beta about, meaning that nobody cared to do anything about them and therefore that any input given about Forsaken World is likely to fall on equally deaf ears.
Either way, I’ll probably poke around Perfect World International for a while longer, at least to get some decent screenshots for my submission of Genesis on MobyGames, to verify something I kept wondering about last time and also to at least partially check to see if my Perfect World International Information Dump post is still accurate. But I’ll need to do it while starting over on Forsaken World, since they have changed their plans yet again and moved the open beta from March 23rd to March 9th, so the closed beta characters will get wiped in a few days and I’ll have some testing to do all over again. Which I’m actually quite content with, because I haven’t been advancing for the past few days anyway because of the rotten gameplay mechanics that this game has, which make it practically impossible to advance past level 25 on your own, so at least I’ll have something to play for a few more days, until I’ll hit that limit again and most likely give up for good.

Written by Cavalary on March 6, 2011 at 7:44 PM in Personal | 0 Comments

To Game Graphic Designers: Armor Is Supposed to Protect You!

If you look at the way characters look in fantasy games, and particularly in MMO games, you immediately notice that their gear seems designed to do pretty much anything but protect them! Now you may say that’s because it’s fantasy and anything goes, but I’m going to disagree. That excuse may work for fantasy art, where you have separate works that are mainly supposed to simply look good, but a game should make some sort of sense, even if it is fantasy, and as a result a character’s armor should look like it could actually protect them from blows instead of either just looking cool while getting in the way or, if the character is female, exposing certain physical assets in the best way possible!
The part about the female characters would spawn a whole discussion on its own when they are treated in that manner, as nothing more than sexual objects for straight male players to drool over, but I’ll probably leave it to others who are more directly affected by it to press the issue more thoroughly. What I will say right now, however, is that I do sometimes want to make a female character but the result tends to just be frustrating. Yes, I probably like some nice virtual boobs as much as the next guy, but on the one hand there’s something to be said about their size and general aspect and on the other, getting back to the purpose of this post, when I go into battle I want my character to actually look like a warrior who can take a few hits, not a camp follower wondering which side would it pay more to spread her legs for once it’s all over!

What game graphic designers need to understand is that a good game makes you at least really care about the characters you control, if not even identify yourself with them. And that goes even more for MMO games, because in those a character should be a representation of the player behind it. And I don’t think any of that is going to happen if said character looks like either a pompous fop or a prostitute or courtesan, even if a very classy one. Now of course gear should, if possible, look good as well, but it must look useful first and then, as the character obtains better and better items, the design should improve to incorporate elements meant to make it increasingly appealing, but only as long as it manages to still look useful even with them. Plus that I certainly think female characters can look good without being dressed as harlots as well…
When you have either characters that start by needing to prove themselves somehow or situations where all those who could possibly fight are quickly summoned to face a sudden and serious threat, which are the most common starting points of such games, the gear should reflect that. Level one armor should probably look more like what you saw Egyptians use when shit hit the fan in Tahrir Square, when they wore pots, garbage cans, plastic bottles wrapped in sticky tape or cardboard boxes stuffed with balls of paper as helmets, and pot lids or parts of car bodies as shields. Or like something I recall seeing in a comic some years ago, portraying just such a level one character with a barrel, with the top and bottom cut off and holes for the arms on the sides, acting as torso armor, some cans slid on the arms and a chamberpot worn as a helmet. And, of course, level one weapons should be equally makeshift and rudimentary.
Then, once the characters have proved their worth or the immediate threat is averted, as the case may be, and said characters are given some better gear to help them start taking the fight to the enemy, said gear should look like proper military gear but still be purely functional. You should see something that properly covers your body and gives you some degree of confidence that if you actually went into a battle wearing it you wouldn’t drop dead after the first hit. You shouldn’t see decorations, appendages on armor that would just get in the way or fancy robes that would just trip you up. And you most certainly shouldn’t see “armor” that exposes as much of the chest, and perhaps also abdomen, as possible! Yet those things are usually just what you do see in such games…
Once you get past that point and start making your way through the world, becoming stronger and stronger and performing glorious deed after glorious deed, the gear you’ll be able to find and equip should reflect that as well. It should stay functional, the armor clearly providing good protection for every part of your body and the weapons clearly being deadly but also reasonably easy, or at least possible, to wield, but purely aesthetic design elements should start being incorporated as well. Start with some nicer lines, some pretty colors, an emblem here or a pattern there, and then focus on improving this aspect more and more, ending up with some pieces that look utterly stunning but at the same time appear to remain very useful and efficient.

With this approach, players will actually notice the progression of their characters and it will all make sense. They will look like warriors, or whatever is appropriate for their chosen class, from the first moment to the last, but their deeds and their strength will be reflected in their appearance as time passes, with the stark contrast between their humble beginnings and their glorious apotheosis serving to enhance the feeling of accomplishment even more. They will look like the heroes who truly changed or, more often, saved the world instead of like the paramours or courtesans fighting for said heroes’ attention, and I’m applying this to male characters as well, though in a different way. It will create one more goal to work towards while at the same time making the whole work together even better. And, of course, going back to the other angle a part of this issue can be approached from, this should also make for plausible female characters the sight of which won’t offend a significant part of the women who could perhaps want to play them…

Written by Cavalary on March 2, 2011 at 12:30 AM in Gaming | 0 Comments